Self-Storage REIT Highlights
CubeSmart
- Fundamentals continued to recover: Revenue increased 0.8% and new-customer move-in rates rose 1.7%.
- Occupancy turned positive in July: 91.1%, up 30 bps YoY, with rental volume up 3% and vacates down 3%.
- Supply remains the key variable: Pressure is dissipating broadly, but several Sunbelt markets remain slower to recover.
Extra Space Storage
- Operating growth led the group: Same-store rental revenue increased 2.5%, NOI rose 3.5%, and occupancy ended at 94.2%.
- Supply relief is driving recovery: Austin, Dallas and Miami moved positive on new-customer rates, while Houston, Tampa and Phoenix remained pressured.
- Off-market activity remains dominant: 18 stores acquired for $91M, nearly all off market, plus $141M of new bridge loans.
Public Storage
- Rates turned positive: Move-in rents increased 1.6% YoY; June reached +4%.
- Occupancy strengthened: 92.4% in Q2, up 20 bps YoY, alongside materially lower churn.
- Deal activity accelerated: More than $450M acquired or under contract YTD, with market yields in the low-5% range.
SmartStop Self Storage
- Margins expanded significantly: Revenue increased 1.3%, expenses declined 3.4%, and NOI rose 3.7%, pushing margins to 67.3%.
- Pricing improved entering Q3: Q2 web rates fell 3.8%, but reversed to +1.2% YoY in July; in-place rates were up more than 2%.
- Acquisition opportunities are emerging: Three properties were acquired for $29.7M at a high-5% cap rate, alongside $16.3M of bridge capital at a double-digit yield.
Thoughts from the CEO’s
Macroeconomic Highlights
Self-Storage & Manufactured Housing Market Trends 2026: The broader macroeconomic environment during Q2 2026 remained more restrictive than many investors had expected entering the year. The Federal Reserve held its benchmark rate steady at 3.50%-3.75% through its July meeting — the fifth consecutive hold — with three regional presidents dissenting in favor of a hike as inflation remained above the Fed’s 2% target, keeping borrowing costs and refinancing coupons elevated for both sectors’ acquisition and bridge-lending activity. Despite that backdrop, investor confidence continued to build across commercial real estate as buyers grew more willing to transact despite ongoing rate volatility, a dynamic borne out directly in the transcripts: Public Storage, Extra Space and CubeSmart all reported improved deal flow at broadly steady cap rates, Public Storage noted sellers becoming more willing to transact, and Sun Communities described the institutional manufactured housing transaction market as very active even as initial yields stayed in the low-to-mid-4% range. Elevated-but-stable rates, in other words, appear to be normalizing into a workable underwriting environment rather than continuing to suppress deal volume.
New supply growth remained the more consequential macro factor for both property types this quarter. Elevated construction costs, tighter underwriting standards, labor shortages and longer development timelines continued to constrain new competitive supply broadly across commercial real estate, and both sectors pointed to this directly as a tailwind: self-storage operators cited moderating new development as the primary driver of improving occupancy and rate growth (even as several Sunbelt submarkets continue working through prior oversupply), while manufactured housing operators highlighted limited new community development — itself a function of high construction costs and zoning constraints — as a key support for occupancy above 90-98% and continued rent growth. Demographic and affordability trends reinforced these supply-side dynamics: reduced housing mobility and a growing “lack of space” storage need supported self-storage retention, while housing affordability pressures and an aging population continued to funnel demand into manufactured housing. Combined with moderating new supply, improving operating efficiency, and disciplined, largely off-market capital deployment, these conditions supported a gradually improving performance picture for both sectors entering the second half of 2026.
Inflation and the 10-Year Treasury Since 2022

Inflation and the 10-Year Treasury Since 1962

Q2 2026 Self-Storage REIT Data Overview
| Same Store Ending Occupancy | Same Store YoY Rental Revenue Increase | Same Store YoY Expense Increase | Same Store YoY NOI Increase | Same Store Achieved Rate | Acquisitions | ||||||||
| 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | % Change | 2026 | 2025 | |
| CUBE | 91.00% | 91.10% | 0.50% | -0.70% | 4.40% | 1.20% | -0.70% | -1.10% | $23.31 | $23.37 | -0.3% | 0 | 0 |
| EXR | 94.20% | 94.60% | 2.50% | 0.20% | -0.50% | 8.60% | 3.50% | -3.10% | $19.95 | $19.68 | 1.4% | 17 | 2 |
| NSA | 86.00% | 85.00% | 1.36% | -3.13% | -4.31% | 4.59% | 2.82% | -6.08% | $15.80 | $15.68 | 0.8% | - | 2 |
| PSA | 92.40% | 92.20% | -0.50% | 0.20% | 4.30% | 2.10% | -1.90% | -0.30% | $22.09 | $22.67 | -2.6% | 20 | 16 |
| SMA | 92.40% | 93.00% | 1.28% | 0.40% | -3.38% | 3.48% | 3.68% | -1.10% | $20.33 | $19.89 | 2.2% | 3 | 7 |
Q2 2026 Self-Storage Operating Fundamentals
Self-Storage Rental Rates
Rental-rate trends improved across much of the sector in Q2 2026, although the pace varied materially by operator and geography. Public Storage reported average move-in rents up 1.6% year over year, with move-in rates 18% higher than Q4 2025; June was particularly strong, with move-in rents up 4%. CubeSmart reported new-customer move-in rates up 1.7% year over year, an 80-basis-point sequential improvement, while realized annual rent per occupied square foot increased 0.7% to $22.34. Extra Space Storage said the rate gains established through 2025 and early 2026 were increasingly embedded in its revenue base; June rates were slightly ahead of the prior year, while July shifted to slightly lower rates but slightly higher occupancy as its pricing system optimized the tradeoff between the two.
SmartStop Self Storage REIT was the exception to the broader Q2 improvement in new-customer pricing. Web rates declined 3.8% and achieved move-in rates per square foot fell 4.4% during the quarter, although annualized rent per occupied square foot increased 1.9% and in-place rates were more than 2% higher by the end of July. Encouragingly, SmartStop’s web rates turned positive in July at +1.2% year over year even as July move-in rates remained approximately 5% lower. Geographic dispersion remained significant across the REITs: Extra Space reported Austin, Dallas and Miami turning positive in new-customer move-in rates while Houston, Tampa and Phoenix remained difficult; CubeSmart cited strength in New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, Columbus, Cleveland and improving West Coast markets, while Sunbelt pricing remained more challenged.
Achieved Rates (Same Store)

Self-Storage Occupancy
Occupancy remained healthy and generally stable across the four REITs. Extra Space Storage ended Q2 at 94.2%, the highest reported level among the group, while Public Storage reported 92.4% occupancy, up 20 basis points year over year. Public Storage’s July occupancy improved further to roughly 30 basis points above the prior year, while move-out activity had already fallen 8% during Q2. SmartStop averaged 92.5% occupancy, compared with 93.1% a year earlier, and ended the quarter at 92.4%. July occupancy eased to 92.1%, 65 basis points below the prior year, reflecting management’s deliberate emphasis on maintaining pricing rather than maximizing physical occupancy.
CubeSmart averaged 90.4% occupancy during Q2 and ended the quarter at 91.0%, flat with the prior year. By July 30, occupancy had risen to 91.1%, 30 basis points above the same date in 2025, while rental volumes were 3% higher and vacate activity was 3% lower. Retention trends were a common positive across the group. Extra Space said lower housing mobility was increasingly contributing to customer stickiness: customers storing because they lack space have replaced some moving-related demand, and their expected length of stay is at least twice as long. Public Storage likewise reported materially lower churn, while CubeSmart cited lower vacates and elongating lengths of stay as signs of continued customer health.
Period Ending Occupancy (Same Store)

Self-Storage Income & Expenses
Operating performance was mixed but generally improved from earlier periods. Extra Space Storage led the group with 2.4% same-store revenue growth, accelerating 70 basis points from Q1, while same-store NOI increased 3.5% and expenses declined modestly year over year. SmartStop generated 1.3% same-store revenue growth, supported by a 1.9% increase in annualized rent per occupied square foot, while operating expenses declined 3.4%. That combination drove same-store NOI growth of 3.7% and expanded SmartStop’s same-store operating margin by 150 basis points to 67.3%. SmartStop also reported Canadian joint venture NOI growth of 9.4%, while its managed-platform revenue reached $6.76 million, up 67%.
CubeSmart reported 0.8% same-store revenue growth, up from 0.6% in Q1, but 4.4% operating-expense growth pushed same-store NOI down 0.7%. Personnel costs and property taxes were the primary expense pressures after four consecutive years of expense control, although management expects expense growth to moderate during the second half. Public Storage reported same-store revenue down 0.6% and NOI down 1.9%, both ahead of internal expectations, while expenses rose 4.3% due primarily to property taxes and marketing. Payroll savings from machine-learning-based staffing partially offset those pressures. Outside Public Storage’s same-store pool, NOI grew 22% and ancillary income grew 15%, providing a considerably stronger contribution than the mature same-store portfolio.
YoY Rental Income Growth (Same Store)

YoY Expense Growth (Same Store)

YoY NOI Growth (Same Store)

Self-Storage Investment & Transaction Activity
Transaction activity showed signs of reopening, but the major REITs remained selective. Public Storage said market activity had picked up in 2026 as sellers became more willing to transact; it had acquired or placed under contract more than $450 million of properties year to date, approximately 70% off market, with a meaningful portion consisting of lease-up assets. Public Storage also closed the NSA transaction involving approximately 1,100 stores and 575,000 units and announced the $1.2 billion acquisition of Public Storage Canada, whose portfolio was approximately 83% occupied with a 65% NOI margin. Its development and expansion pipeline reached $692 million across 47 projects, while the lending platform expanded to $173 million and third-party management exceeded 460 properties.
Extra Space Storage closed 18 stores for $91 million during Q2, almost entirely through off-market transactions, while originating $141 million of bridge loans and ending the quarter with roughly $1.5 billion of outstanding bridge-loan balances. It also added 67 third-party-managed stores, or 48 net, bringing the managed portfolio to 1,964 stores. SmartStop deployed $29.7 million to acquire three Spartanburg properties and another $16.3 million into a preferred investment at a double-digit yield, followed by another $3.1 million after quarter-end; its full-year capital deployment target was increased to $55 million-$75 million. CubeSmart, meanwhile, agreed to contribute 15 noncore assets valued at $197 million into a joint venture while retaining a 20% interest, added 25 third-party-managed stores to reach 872, and continued a New York joint venture development expected to require $28 million of total investment.
Acquisition Dollar Amount History

*Excludes PSA Acquisition of ezStorage in Q2 2021 for $1.8 Billion
*Excludes PSA Acquisition of All Storage in Q4 2021 for $1.5 Billion
*Excludes PSA Acquisition of Simply Storage in Q3 2023 for $2.2 Billion
*Excludes EXR Acquisition of Life Storage in Q3 2023 for $11.6 Billion
Under Construction NRSF as a % of Existing Inventory – March 2026

* Source: Yardi Matrix
NRSF Delivered as a % of Starting Inventory – Last 36 & 12 Months – March 2026

* Source: Yardi Matrix
Self-Storage Cap Rates & Bid-Ask Spread
Cap rates were generally clustered in the mid-5% range for U.S. self-storage assets, but the reporting indicates that brokered-market pricing remained relatively aggressive. Public Storage described transaction yields as roughly steady in the low 5% range even as sellers became more willing to transact. SmartStop acquired its three-property Spartanburg portfolio at approximately a 5.9% cap rate and said its acquisition target remained around that level; management characterized stabilized U.S. opportunities at roughly the mid-5% range and Canadian opportunities at approximately 4%-5%. CubeSmart said the 15 assets contributed into its newly formed joint venture were valued at approximately a mid-5% cap rate.
None of the four transcripts quantified an explicit bid-ask spread, but their acquisition commentary shows that a pricing gap remained. Extra Space Storage described asset pricing as elevated and said brokered transactions remained expensive enough that it continued to favor proprietary pipelines, relationship transactions, bridge-loan opportunities and off-market deals; nearly all of its $91 million of Q2 acquisitions were off market. SmartStop similarly said brokered acquisition pricing remained somewhat high and that off-market transactions appeared more attractive, while Public Storage’s comment that sellers were becoming more willing to transact suggests some movement toward clearing prices. The evidence therefore points to a narrowing or more manageable gap than during the market’s more stagnant phase.
Implied Cap Rate History

*The implied cap rate data indicates the market value of each REIT.
The implied capitalization rate is a culmination of the company value and total debt of each company divided by its NOI.
Enterprise Value History

Headwinds in the Self-Storage Market
New supply remained the clearest industry headwind, particularly across the Sunbelt. CubeSmart called supply the industry’s primary headwind and said Sunbelt markets continued to experience the greatest pressure from both new deliveries and macroeconomic effects on consumers. Cape Coral was cited as an example of a market that could take years to absorb its excess supply. Public Storage similarly reported that markets including Tampa, Orlando, Atlanta, Charlotte and parts of Texas remained negative despite sequential improvement, with management expecting portions of the Sunbelt to remain negative into 2027. Extra Space Storage reported continued difficulty in Houston, Tampa and Phoenix, although Austin, Dallas and Miami had turned positive on new-customer rates.
Macroeconomic and regulatory pressures remained secondary risks. Extra Space cited low consumer confidence, inflation and other macro forces as reasons for maintaining caution even though it had not yet experienced a material deterioration in customer health. SmartStop said geopolitical uncertainty, tariffs and related macro concerns had delayed rental decisions in portions of the Greater Toronto Area, while the expected entrance of Public Storage into Canada was viewed as creating a more competitive environment. Rental restrictions in Los Angeles also remained a drag during Q2: SmartStop’s seven affected properties generated negative 2% same-store revenue growth, Public Storage estimated the restrictions represented roughly a 50-basis-point full-year revenue headwind, and Extra Space estimated a 20-30-basis-point full-year impact after previously assuming 40 basis points.
Tailwinds in the Self-Storage Market
The most consistent tailwind across the four REITs was the moderation of new supply paired with steady, resilient demand. Extra Space Storage explicitly attributed improving performance to continued supply reduction rather than a meaningful increase in total customer demand, while Public Storage described steady national demand alongside slowing development activity. CubeSmart likewise reported dissipating supply headwinds across most core markets and stronger operating trends in the East Coast, Midwest and West Coast. Public Storage’s coastal and Midwestern markets were already producing stronger growth, while previously pressured Sunbelt markets were showing sequential improvement as existing supply was absorbed.
Customer retention and demographic trends provide additional support. Extra Space reported that the share of customers associated with moving had fallen from the low-60% range to approximately 55%, with much of that demand replaced by customers storing because they lack space; those customers have an expected stay at least twice as long as moving-related customers. CubeSmart reported lower vacates, longer customer stays and July rental volume up 3%, while Public Storage reported move-outs down 8% and lower churn. Public Storage also identified a longer-term demographic tailwind as millennials—already its largest customer cohort—and Gen Z age further into core self-storage usage years. Finally, the expiration of Los Angeles pricing restrictions removes an identifiable drag for Public Storage, Extra Space and SmartStop, adding another source of potential revenue improvement through the second half of 2026 and into 2027.
Q2 2026 Self-Storage REIT Data by MSA
| Average Occupancy Same Store | Achieved Rate Same Store | |||||||||||
| CUBE | EXR | PSA | SMA | Average | CUBE | EXR | PSA | SMA | Average | |||
| Asheville, NC | - | - | - | 91.80% | 91.80% | Asheville, NC | - | - | - | $16.72 | $16.72 | |
| Atlanta, GA | 88.10% | 92.80% | 90.00% | - | 90.30% | Atlanta, GA | $14.98 | $16.07 | $15.35 | - | $15.47 | |
| Austin, TX | 91.60% | 93.90% | - | - | 92.75% | Austin, TX | $15.99 | $15.97 | - | - | $15.98 | |
| Baltimore, MD | 91.30% | - | 94.90% | - | 93.10% | Baltimore, MD | $22.53 | - | $22.45 | - | $22.49 | |
| Boston, MA | 91.50% | 92.80% | 94.00% | - | 92.77% | Boston, MA | $26.63 | $25.77 | $29.39 | - | $27.26 | |
| Bridgeport, CT | 91.90% | - | - | - | 91.90% | Bridgeport, CT | $27.82 | - | - | - | $27.82 | |
| Charleston, SC | 89.80% | 93.80% | - | - | 91.80% | Charleston, SC | $15.05 | $22.11 | - | - | $18.58 | |
| Charlotte, NC | 91.50% | 93.40% | 89.10% | - | 91.33% | Charlotte, NC | $17.20 | $16.92 | $15.27 | - | $16.46 | |
| Chicago, IL | 92.00% | 93.20% | 94.00% | 92.00% | 92.80% | Chicago, IL | $20.30 | $21.19 | $21.28 | $16.91 | $19.92 | |
| Cleveland, OH | 90.20% | - | - | - | 90.20% | Cleveland, OH | $17.10 | - | - | - | $17.10 | |
| Columbus, OH | 91.00% | - | - | - | 91.00% | Columbus, OH | $13.62 | - | - | - | $13.62 | |
| Dallas, TX | 90.50% | 93.40% | 90.70% | - | 91.53% | Dallas, TX | $16.02 | $17.04 | $16.42 | - | $16.49 | |
| DC | 91.20% | 94.50% | 94.00% | - | 93.23% | DC | $27.62 | $24.45 | $28.15 | - | $26.74 | |
| Denver, CO | 89.50% | 92.80% | 92.70% | 92.90% | 91.98% | Denver, CO | $18.37 | $18.26 | $18.47 | $17.87 | $18.24 | |
| Detroit, MI | - | - | 92.50% | - | 92.50% | Detroit, MI | - | - | $18.09 | - | $18.09 | |
| Ft Myers, FL | 85.50% | - | - | - | 85.50% | Ft Myers, FL | $17.57 | - | - | - | $17.57 | |
| Hawaii, HI | - | 94.00% | 96.40% | - | 95.20% | Hawaii, HI | - | $46.64 | $57.27 | - | $51.96 | |
| Hartford, CT | 88.40% | 92.70% | - | - | 90.55% | Hartford, CT | $17.61 | $19.84 | - | - | $18.73 | |
| Houston, TX | 91.40% | 93.30% | 88.80% | 93.10% | 91.65% | Houston, TX | $17.22 | $15.81 | $16.24 | $18.82 | $17.02 | |
| Indianapolis. IN | - | 92.30% | - | - | 92.30% | Indianapolis. IN | - | $12.47 | - | - | $12.47 | |
| Jacksonville, FL | 91.00% | - | - | - | 91.00% | Jacksonville, FL | $20.60 | - | - | - | $20.60 | |
| Las Vegas, NV | 90.80% | 92.80% | - | 92.50% | 92.03% | Las Vegas, NV | $17.67 | $18.97 | - | $19.73 | $18.79 | |
| Los Angeles, CA | 91.00% | 94.70% | 95.30% | 92.30% | 93.33% | Los Angeles, CA | $27.85 | $27.77 | $34.59 | $27.32 | $29.38 | |
| Miami, FL | 91.80% | 94.40% | 93.50% | 92.30% | 93.00% | Miami, FL | $25.52 | $27.46 | $29.24 | $26.04 | $27.07 | |
| Minneapolis, MN | - | - | 94.40% | - | 94.40% | Minneapolis, MN | - | - | $17.35 | - | $17.35 | |
| Nantucket, MA | - | - | - | 90.10% | 90.10% | Nantucket, MA | - | - | - | $43.76 | $43.76 | |
| Nashville, TN | 91.00% | - | - | - | 91.00% | Nashville, TN | $16.36 | - | - | - | $16.36 | |
| New York, NY | 90.60% | 94.10% | 93.50% | - | 92.73% | New York, NY | $39.10 | $28.96 | $33.16 | - | $33.74 | |
| Norfolk, VA | - | 93.40% | - | - | 93.40% | Norfolk, VA | - | $15.78 | - | - | $15.78 | |
| Orlando, FL | 91.20% | 93.50% | 90.30% | - | 91.67% | Orlando, FL | $15.98 | $16.64 | $17.73 | - | $16.78 | |
| Philadelphia, PA | 91.70% | 94.70% | 94.20% | - | 93.53% | Philadelphia, PA | $19.82 | $19.65 | $20.33 | - | $19.93 | |
| Phoenix, AZ | 89.50% | 92.90% | 93.50% | 94.20% | 92.53% | Phoenix, AZ | $15.90 | $16.79 | $18.51 | $17.21 | $17.10 | |
| Portland. OR | - | - | 91.90% | - | 91.90% | Portland. OR | - | - | $21.14 | - | $21.14 | |
| Port St. Lucie, FL | - | - | - | 92.40% | 92.40% | Port St. Lucie, FL | - | - | - | $18.87 | $18.87 | |
| Providence, RI | 90.60% | - | - | - | 90.60% | Providence, RI | $19.44 | - | - | - | $19.44 | |
| Richmond, VA | - | 93.40% | - | - | 93.40% | Richmond, VA | - | $19.88 | - | - | $19.88 | |
| Riverside, CA | 88.80% | - | - | 93.30% | 91.05% | Riverside, CA | $19.10 | - | - | $22.15 | $20.63 | |
| Sacramento, CA | 83.50% | 93.30% | 92.70% | - | 89.83% | Sacramento, CA | $17.39 | $17.45 | $21.47 | - | $18.77 | |
| San Antonio, TX | 91.40% | 91.20% | - | - | 91.30% | San Antonio, TX | $15.24 | $13.56 | - | - | $14.40 | |
| San Diego, CA | 90.50% | 93.80% | 94.90% | 91.70% | 92.73% | San Diego, CA | $25.92 | $26.65 | $30.75 | $28.22 | $27.89 | |
| San Fransisco, CA | - | 93.70% | 94.90% | 90.80% | 93.13% | San Fransisco, CA | - | $35.64 | $34.39 | $22.69 | $30.91 | |
| Seattle, WA | - | 93.40% | 92.80% | 92.90% | 93.03% | Seattle, WA | - | $19.88 | $26.53 | $21.44 | $22.62 | |
| St. Louis, MO | - | 93.40% | - | - | 93.40% | St. Louis, MO | - | $15.58 | - | - | $15.58 | |
| Tampa, FL | 87.40% | 91.70% | 89.70% | 91.80% | 90.15% | Tampa, FL | $21.76 | $18.94 | $18.53 | $19.29 | $19.63 | |
| Toronto, Canada | - | - | - | 92.60% | 92.60% | Toronto, Canada | - | - | - | $21.33 | $21.33 | |
| Toucson, AZ | 85.00% | - | - | - | 85.00% | Toucson, AZ | $15.48 | - | - | - | $15.48 | |
| West Palm Beach, FL | - | 94.00% | 93.10% | - | 93.55% | West Palm Beach, FL | - | $20.25 | $25.66 | - | $22.96 | |
| Other | 89.30% | 93.10% | 92.00% | 92.60% | 91.75% | Other | $18.01 | $15.52 | $15.93 | $17.47 | $16.73 | |
| Total | 90.40% | 93.40% | 92.50% | 92.50% | 92.20% | Total | $22.34 | $19.94 | $21.89 | $20.33 | $21.13 | |
Contributors
Steven Paul
Senior Financial Analyst
Aaron Sanchez
Managing Director
Scott Schoettlin
Senior Managing Director


